Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRSX vs VTMNX
FGRSX vs VTMNX Comparison
Open Charts FGRSX vs VTMNX
FGRSX vs VTMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRSX vs. VTMNX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRSX is a Hold and VTMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMNX has more cash in the bank: 316B vs. FGRSX (1.47B). VTMNX pays higher dividends than FGRSX: VTMNX (2.54) vs FGRSX (2.26). FGRSX was incepted earlier than VTMNX: FGRSX (13 years) vs VTMNX (26 years). FGRSX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VTMNX (0.03). FGRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. VTMNX (4.00). FGRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMNX: FGRSX (0) vs VTMNX (5000000). VTMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.85 vs. FGRSX (7.62). VTMNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.23 vs. FGRSX (16.70).
| FGRSX | VTMNX | FGRSX / VTMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.03 | 2,467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.334 | 11.810 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 316B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 2.54 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.62 | 20.85 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.52 | 49.21 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.70 | 38.23 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.49 | 100.05 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers