Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRSX vs VTMNX
FGRSX vs VTMNX Comparison
Open Charts FGRSX vs VTMNX
FGRSX vs VTMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRSX vs. VTMNX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRSX is a Hold and VTMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMNX has more cash in the bank: 315B vs. FGRSX (1.52B). VTMNX pays higher dividends than FGRSX: VTMNX (2.56) vs FGRSX (2.29). FGRSX was incepted earlier than VTMNX: FGRSX (13 years) vs VTMNX (26 years). FGRSX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VTMNX (0.03). FGRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. VTMNX (4.00). FGRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMNX: FGRSX (0) vs VTMNX (5000000). VTMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.76 vs. FGRSX (11.26). VTMNX return over 5 years is better than : 45.83 vs. FGRSX (21.03).
| FGRSX | VTMNX | FGRSX / VTMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.03 | 2,467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.372 | 18.097 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 315B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 2.56 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.26 | 25.76 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.13 | 68.03 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.03 | 45.83 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.20 | 108.30 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers