Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRTX vs FWWMX
FGRTX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts FGRTX vs FWWMX
FGRTX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRTX vs. FWWMX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRTX is a Buy and FWWMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FGRTX (7.3B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than FGRTX: FWWMX (1.41) vs FGRTX (0.71). FGRTX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: FGRTX (28 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). FGRTX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGRTX (16.00). FGRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: FGRTX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FGRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.24 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FGRTX return over 5 years is better than : 94.69 vs. FWWMX (30.17).
| FGRTX | FWWMX | FGRTX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.31 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.31 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.637 | 4.506 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.3B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.41 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.24 | 2.09 | 731% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.49 | 30.23 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.69 | 30.17 | 314% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers