Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSAX vs PEMGX
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PEMGX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth A
Price$61.94
Change+$0.07 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.15B
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs. PEMGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. FGSAX (5.16B). FGSAX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSAX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FGSAX (41 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). FGSAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). FGSAX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSAX: PEMGX (1000) vs FGSAX (1500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.76 vs. PEMGX (-6.54). FGSAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. PEMGX (24.68).
| FGSAX | PEMGX | FGSAX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.91 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.274 | -0.680 | -1,069% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.16B | 30.9B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.76 | -6.54 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.51 | 32.28 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.38 | 24.68 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.71 | 89.67 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers