Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSAX vs PEMGX
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PEMGX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth A
Price$64.73
Change-$0.58 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.65B
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs. PEMGX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 32.9B vs. FGSAX (4.65B). FGSAX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSAX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FGSAX (41 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). FGSAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). FGSAX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSAX: PEMGX (1000) vs FGSAX (1500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.99 vs. PEMGX (7.42). PEMGX (43.12) and FGSAX (41.55) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGSAX | PEMGX | FGSAX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.91 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.106 | 7.321 | 165% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.65B | 32.9B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.99 | 7.42 | 337% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.76 | 43.70 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.55 | 43.12 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.91 | 114.73 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers