Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSAX vs PEMGX
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PEMGX
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs. PEMGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.3B vs. FGSAX (6.73B). FGSAX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSAX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FGSAX (42 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). FGSAX (1.30) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FGSAX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSAX: PEMGX (1000) vs FGSAX (1500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.24 vs. PEMGX (-19.11). FGSAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.03 vs. PEMGX (-9.00).
| FGSAX | PEMGX | FGSAX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.90 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.90 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.796 | -8.102 | -10% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.73B | 21.3B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.24 | -19.11 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.61 | 9.32 | 522% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.03 | -9.00 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.38 | 71.78 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement