Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSAX vs PEMGX
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PEMGX
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. FGSAX (6.54B). FGSAX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSAX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FGSAX (42 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). FGSAX (1.30) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FGSAX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSAX: PEMGX (1000) vs FGSAX (1500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.17 vs. PEMGX (-16.90). FGSAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.75 vs. PEMGX (-6.15).
| FGSAX | PEMGX | FGSAX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.90 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.90 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.774 | -5.598 | 32% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.54B | 23B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.17 | -16.90 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 10.36 | 381% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.75 | -6.15 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.73 | 72.05 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement