Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSAX vs PEMGX
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PEMGX
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. FGSAX (6.8B). FGSAX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSAX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FGSAX (42 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). FGSAX (1.30) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FGSAX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSAX: PEMGX (1000) vs FGSAX (1500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.31 vs. PEMGX (-12.72). FGSAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.50 vs. PEMGX (-2.01).
| FGSAX | PEMGX | FGSAX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.90 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.90 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.625 | -3.290 | -49% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.8B | 24.3B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.31 | -12.72 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.17 | 14.14 | 348% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.50 | -2.01 | -422% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.54 | 84.57 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement