Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSAX vs PMBCX
FGSAX vs PMBCX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PMBCX
FGSAX vs PMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs. PMBCX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Buy and PMBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. FGSAX (6.54B). FGSAX (0.00) and PMBCX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSAX was incepted earlier than PMBCX: FGSAX (42 years) vs PMBCX (20 years). PMBCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FGSAX (1.30). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. PMBCX (13.70). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSAX: PMBCX (1000) vs FGSAX (1500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.17 vs. PMBCX (-18.69). FGSAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.75 vs. PMBCX (-13.69).
| FGSAX | PMBCX | FGSAX / PMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.71 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.71 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.774 | -6.033 | 29% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.54B | 23B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.17 | -18.69 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 5.04 | 783% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.75 | -13.69 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.73 | 48.77 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement