Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs PEMGX
FGSCX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs PEMGX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$28.23
Change-$0.18 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.06B
FGSCX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. PEMGX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. FGSCX (5.06B). FGSCX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSCX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FGSCX (30 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: PEMGX (1000) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.60 vs. PEMGX (3.71). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.37 vs. FGSCX (-0.32).
| FGSCX | PEMGX | FGSCX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.91 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.91 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.935 | 5.655 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.06B | 33.2B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.60 | 3.71 | 367% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.27 | 47.93 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.32 | 44.37 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.98 | 110.90 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers