Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs PEMGX
FGSCX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs PEMGX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$27.59
Change+$0.35 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.05B
FGSCX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. FGSCX (4.05B). FGSCX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSCX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FGSCX (30 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: PEMGX (1000) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.28 vs. PEMGX (11.68). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 58.56 vs. FGSCX (7.46).
| FGSCX | PEMGX | FGSCX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.91 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.91 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.010 | 3.426 | 234% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.05B | 30.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.28 | 11.68 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.27 | 45.14 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.46 | 58.56 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.78 | 95.85 | -25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement