Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs PEMGX
FGSCX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs PEMGX
FGSCX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. FGSCX (6.54B). FGSCX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSCX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FGSCX (31 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). FGSCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: PEMGX (1000) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.71 vs. PEMGX (-16.32). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -6.04 vs. FGSCX (-31.19).
| FGSCX | PEMGX | FGSCX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.90 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.90 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.208 | -5.598 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.54B | 23B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.71 | -16.32 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.73 | 8.28 | 262% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.19 | -6.04 | 517% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.49 | 72.36 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement