Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs PEMGX
FGSCX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs PEMGX
FGSCX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 24.1B vs. FGSCX (6.69B). FGSCX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSCX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FGSCX (31 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). FGSCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: PEMGX (1000) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.77 vs. PEMGX (-13.56). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.06 vs. FGSCX (-24.22).
| FGSCX | PEMGX | FGSCX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.90 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.90 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.327 | -6.408 | 5% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.69B | 24.1B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.77 | -13.56 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.75 | 14.30 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.22 | -2.06 | 1,178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.92 | 81.67 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement