Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSIX vs RPMGX
FGSIX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSIX vs RPMGX
FGSIX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSIX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSIX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. FGSIX (6.73B). FGSIX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSIX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: FGSIX (17 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). FGSIX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.77). FGSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RPMGX (31.50). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSIX: RPMGX (2500) vs FGSIX (1000000). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.56 vs. FGSIX (-7.65). FGSIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.46 vs. RPMGX (-24.68).
| FGSIX | RPMGX | FGSIX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.77 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.77 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.014 | -0.051 | -1,972% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.73B | 21.1B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.65 | -6.56 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.88 | -1.58 | -3,221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.46 | -24.68 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.55 | 28.29 | 324% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement