Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSIX vs RRMGX
FGSIX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSIX vs RRMGX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth IS
Price$69.59
Change-$0.55 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.1B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$89.77
Change-$1.00 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.99B
FGSIX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSIX vs. RRMGX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSIX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. FGSIX (5.1B). FGSIX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSIX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: FGSIX (16 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FGSIX (0.98). FGSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSIX: RRMGX (2500) vs FGSIX (1000000). FGSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.74 vs. RRMGX (-5.75). FGSIX return over 5 years is better than : 43.79 vs. RRMGX (-7.49).
| FGSIX | RRMGX | FGSIX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.29 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.29 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.220 | 3.242 | 408% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.1B | 27B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.74 | -5.75 | -361% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.75 | 16.49 | 550% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.79 | -7.49 | -585% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.11 | 19.62 | 322% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement