Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSIX vs RRMGX
FGSIX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSIX vs RRMGX
FGSIX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSIX vs. RRMGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSIX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. FGSIX (6.73B). FGSIX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSIX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: FGSIX (17 years) vs RRMGX (24 years). RRMGX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FGSIX (0.97). FGSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RRMGX (31.50). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSIX: RRMGX (2500) vs FGSIX (1000000). FGSIX (-7.65) and RRMGX (-7.87) have marching annual gain over last year. FGSIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.46 vs. RRMGX (-29.10).
| FGSIX | RRMGX | FGSIX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.31 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.31 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.014 | -0.426 | -238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.73B | 21.1B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.65 | -7.87 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.88 | -5.46 | -932% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.46 | -29.10 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.55 | 16.81 | 545% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement