Ad is loading...
FGSKX vs FSMAX
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$53.39
Change+$1.18 (+2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.14B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$85.16
Change+$1.54 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. FSMAX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. FGSKX (3.14B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: FSMAX (0.54) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSKX (18 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FGSKX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FGSKX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.55 vs. FSMAX (3.90). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.52 vs. FGSKX (49.00).
| FGSKX | FSMAX | FGSKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.04 | 2,571% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.509 | -7.989 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.14B | 36B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.55 | 3.90 | 373% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.69 | 32.38 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.00 | 60.52 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.02 | 59.20 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers