Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs FSMAX
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$60.08
Change+$0.71 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.65B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$99.75
Change+$0.63 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. FGSKX (4.65B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: FSMAX (0.46) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSKX (19 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FGSKX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FGSKX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.12 vs. FSMAX (17.59). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.77 vs. FGSKX (38.97).
| FGSKX | FSMAX | FGSKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.04 | 2,571% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.998 | 9.067 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.65B | 39.6B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.12 | 17.59 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.72 | 48.67 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.97 | 52.77 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.84 | 100.52 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers