Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs FSMAX
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$58.23
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.11B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.35
Change+$0.18 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. FGSKX (4.11B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSKX (19 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FGSKX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FGSKX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.33 vs. FSMAX (15.32). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.64 vs. FGSKX (54.44).
| FGSKX | FSMAX | FGSKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.04 | 2,571% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.979 | 1.419 | 703% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.11B | 37.6B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.33 | 15.32 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.56 | 48.68 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.44 | 66.64 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.92 | 75.26 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement