Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs FSMAX
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$57.20
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.91B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$89.48
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. FGSKX (3.91B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSKX (18 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FGSKX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FGSKX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.64 vs. FSMAX (11.51). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.40 vs. FGSKX (46.88).
| FGSKX | FSMAX | FGSKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.04 | 2,571% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.866 | -1.540 | -511% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.91B | 37.6B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.64 | 11.51 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.60 | 32.40 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.88 | 51.40 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.81 | 69.19 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers