Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs FSMAX
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$60.85
Change+$0.79 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.97B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.74
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. FGSKX (4.97B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: FSMAX (0.44) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSKX (19 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FGSKX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FGSKX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.12 vs. FSMAX (18.13). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.52 vs. FGSKX (47.53).
| FGSKX | FSMAX | FGSKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.04 | 2,571% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.299 | 10.849 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.97B | 41B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.12 | 18.13 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.74 | 55.96 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.53 | 60.52 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.45 | 103.35 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement