Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs FSMAX
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$58.82
Change+$0.27 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.28B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. FGSKX (4.28B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: FSMAX (0.47) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSKX (19 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FGSKX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FGSKX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.02 vs. FSMAX (12.57). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.70 vs. FGSKX (44.53).
| FGSKX | FSMAX | FGSKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.04 | 2,571% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.451 | 5.161 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.28B | 39.2B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.02 | 12.57 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.68 | 54.50 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.53 | 59.70 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.44 | 80.30 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement