Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs FSMAX
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$60.21
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.16B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.11
Change-$0.61 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. FSMAX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. FGSKX (5.16B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: FSMAX (0.44) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSKX (19 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FGSKX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FGSKX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX (18.49) and FGSKX (17.99) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.92 vs. FGSKX (35.67).
| FGSKX | FSMAX | FGSKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.04 | 2,571% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.582 | 13.028 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.16B | 41.4B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.99 | 18.49 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.57 | 71.83 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.67 | 51.92 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.75 | 107.57 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers