Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs FSMAX
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs FSMAX
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. FGSKX (6.74B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSKX (20 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FGSKX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FGSKX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. FGSKX (-2.08). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. FGSKX (8.39).
| FGSKX | FSMAX | FGSKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.04 | 2,514% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.157 | 15.427 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.74B | 42.7B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.08 | 29.23 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.34 | 73.83 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.39 | 33.65 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.47 | 153.47 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement