Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs FSMAX
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs FSMAX
FGSKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. FGSKX (6.94B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSKX (20 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FGSKX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FGSKX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.02 vs. FGSKX (-0.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.53 vs. FGSKX (4.48).
| FGSKX | FSMAX | FGSKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.04 | 2,514% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.118 | 18.774 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.94B | 40.1B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.02 | 27.02 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.89 | 69.94 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.48 | 38.53 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.25 | 140.78 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers