Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSRX vs RGACX
FGSRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FGSRX vs RGACX
FGSRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSRX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSRX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FGSRX (17.5B). FGSRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FGSRX (25 years) vs RGACX (24 years). FGSRX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGSRX (8.28). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSRX: RGACX (250) vs FGSRX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.90 vs. FGSRX (-0.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.75 vs. FGSRX (-8.47).
| FGSRX | RGACX | FGSRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.93 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.93 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.245 | 9.193 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.5B | 342B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.83 | 4.90 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.07 | 44.95 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.47 | 14.75 | -57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.10 | 96.44 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers