Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSRX vs RGACX
FGSRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FGSRX vs RGACX
FGSRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSRX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FGSRX (17.5B). FGSRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FGSRX (25 years) vs RGACX (24 years). FGSRX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGSRX (8.28). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSRX: RGACX (250) vs FGSRX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. FGSRX (-0.58). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. FGSRX (-8.31).
| FGSRX | RGACX | FGSRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.93 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.93 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.515 | 6.959 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.5B | 357B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.58 | 3.68 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.66 | 37.13 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.31 | 13.46 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.80 | 97.58 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement