Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSRX vs RGAEX
FGSRX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts FGSRX vs RGAEX
FGSRX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSRX vs. RGAEX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSRX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FGSRX (17.1B). RGAEX pays higher dividends than FGSRX: RGAEX (0.21) vs FGSRX (0.00). FGSRX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: FGSRX (25 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). FGSRX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.63). RGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGSRX (8.28). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSRX: RGAEX (250) vs FGSRX (1000). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.00 vs. FGSRX (-4.90). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 12.98 vs. FGSRX (-11.94).
| FGSRX | RGAEX | FGSRX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.63 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.63 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.939 | 9.051 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1B | 353B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.90 | -0.00 | 1,088,513% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.67 | 42.68 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.94 | 12.98 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.31 | 105.92 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement