Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSRX vs RGAGX
FGSRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSRX vs RGAGX
FGSRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSRX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FGSRX (17.5B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FGSRX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FGSRX (0.00). FGSRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FGSRX (24 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FGSRX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGSRX (8.28). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSRX: RGAGX (250) vs FGSRX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. FGSRX (3.44). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. FGSRX (-5.98).
| FGSRX | RGAGX | FGSRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.29 | 355% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.29 | 355% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.719 | 8.887 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.5B | 361B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.44 | 12.55 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.24 | 50.34 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.98 | 20.99 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.13 | 122.10 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement