Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSRX vs RGEBX
FGSRX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGSRX vs RGEBX
FGSRX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSRX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSRX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FGSRX (17.1B). FGSRX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSRX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FGSRX (25 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) and FGSRX (1.03) have similar cost to investors . RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGSRX (8.28). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSRX: RGEBX (250) vs FGSRX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.77 vs. FGSRX (-4.90). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.71 vs. FGSRX (-11.94).
| FGSRX | RGEBX | FGSRX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.08 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.08 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.939 | 8.727 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1B | 353B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.90 | -0.77 | 633% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.67 | 39.77 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.94 | 9.71 | -123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.31 | 97.58 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement