Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGTAX vs FWWMX
FGTAX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts FGTAX vs FWWMX
FGTAX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGTAX vs. FWWMX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGTAX is a Buy and FWWMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FGTAX (7.3B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than FGTAX: FWWMX (1.41) vs FGTAX (0.50). FGTAX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: FGTAX (19 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). FGTAX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGTAX (16.00). FGTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: FGTAX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FGTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.86 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FGTAX return over 5 years is better than : 91.60 vs. FWWMX (30.17).
| FGTAX | FWWMX | FGTAX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.353 | 4.506 | 208% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.3B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.41 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.86 | 2.09 | 713% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.68 | 30.23 | 247% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.60 | 30.17 | 304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers