Ad is loading...
FHCCX vs FSPHX
FHCCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.78B vs. FHCCX (4.07B). FHCCX (0.00) and FSPHX (0.00) have matching dividends . FHCCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCCX (27 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FHCCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.06 vs. FHCCX (-9.88). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -4.82 vs. FHCCX (-11.17).
| FHCCX | FSPHX | FHCCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.847 | 1.835 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.07B | 6.78B | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.88 | -3.06 | 323% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.65 | -1.51 | 573% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.17 | -4.82 | 232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.16 | 24.91 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers