Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs FSPHX
FHCCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. FHCCX (3.28B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCCX (28 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FHCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHCCX (37.00). FHCCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.39 vs. FHCCX (-16.77). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.76 vs. FHCCX (-18.04).
| FHCCX | FSPHX | FHCCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.63 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.63 | 268% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.156 | 3.376 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 5.96B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.77 | -10.39 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.24 | 7.09 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.04 | -13.76 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.00 | 36.17 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement