Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs FSPHX
FHCCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. FHCCX (3.35B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCCX (28 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FHCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHCCX (37.00). FHCCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.12 vs. FHCCX (-23.34). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -19.46 vs. FHCCX (-24.18).
| FHCCX | FSPHX | FHCCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.63 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.63 | 268% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.310 | -7.193 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.35B | 5.92B | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.34 | -17.12 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.67 | -4.12 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.18 | -19.46 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.89 | 3.19 | -59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers