Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs FSPHX
FHCCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. FHCCX (3.27B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCCX (28 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FHCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHCCX (37.00). FHCCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.94 vs. FHCCX (-23.07). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.10 vs. FHCCX (-19.39).
| FHCCX | FSPHX | FHCCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.63 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.63 | 268% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.616 | -2.385 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.27B | 5.88B | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.07 | -16.94 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.13 | -2.44 | 374% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.39 | -15.10 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.27 | 17.50 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement