Ad is loading...
FHCCX vs FSPHX
FHCCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. FHCCX (3.74B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCCX (27 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FHCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FHCCX (37.00). FHCCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.61 vs. FHCCX (-15.92). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : 10.17 vs. FHCCX (2.56).
| FHCCX | FSPHX | FHCCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.65 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.65 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.257 | -1.064 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.74B | 6.42B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.92 | -9.61 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.65 | -10.12 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.56 | 10.17 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.69 | 11.87 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...