Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs FSPHX
FHCCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FHCCX vs FSPHX
FHCCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. FHCCX (3.34B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: FSPHX (0.39) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCCX (29 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FHCCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FHCCX (52.00). FHCCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. FHCCX (5.59). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.45 vs. FHCCX (-22.89).
| FHCCX | FSPHX | FHCCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.62 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.62 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.817 | 1.524 | 907% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.34B | 6.75B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.59 | 6.37 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.73 | 4.93 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.89 | -15.45 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.70 | 46.10 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement