Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs FSPHX
FHCCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FHCCX vs FSPHX
FHCCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. FHCCX (3.17B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: FSPHX (0.41) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCCX (29 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FHCCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FHCCX (52.00). FHCCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.22 vs. FHCCX (9.57). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -14.87 vs. FHCCX (-22.29).
| FHCCX | FSPHX | FHCCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.62 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.62 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.912 | -1.326 | -823% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.17B | 6.37B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 10.22 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.09 | 0.21 | -2,960% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.29 | -14.87 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.94 | 41.70 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement