Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs JNGLX
FHCCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and JNGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.95B vs. FHCCX (3.3B). JNGLX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: JNGLX (0.31) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FHCCX (28 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). FHCCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FHCCX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.59 vs. FHCCX (-6.91). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.10 vs. FHCCX (-13.32).
| FHCCX | JNGLX | FHCCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.80 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.80 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.314 | 20.445 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.3B | 4.95B | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.91 | 10.59 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.91 | 26.67 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.32 | 17.10 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.61 | 51.40 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers