Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs JNGLX
FHCCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and JNGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.4B vs. FHCCX (3.35B). JNGLX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: JNGLX (0.36) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FHCCX (28 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). FHCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FHCCX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.43 vs. FHCCX (-20.18). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 4.98 vs. FHCCX (-21.35).
| FHCCX | JNGLX | FHCCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.80 | 211% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.80 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.797 | -1.326 | 286% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.35B | 4.4B | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.18 | -14.43 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.03 | 8.83 | -125% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.35 | 4.98 | -429% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.35 | 6.80 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers