Ad is loading...
FHCCX vs JNGLX
FHCCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and JNGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.71B vs. FHCCX (3.74B). JNGLX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: JNGLX (0.34) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FHCCX (27 years) vs JNGLX (26 years). FHCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FHCCX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.81 vs. FHCCX (-15.53). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.68 vs. FHCCX (-13.66).
| FHCCX | JNGLX | FHCCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.80 | 211% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.80 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.874 | -4.699 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.74B | 4.71B | 79% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.53 | -7.81 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.67 | -0.82 | 1,902% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.66 | 12.68 | -108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.41 | 8.97 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers