Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs JNGLX
FHCCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and JNGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: JNGLX (0.34) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FHCCX (28 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). FHCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FHCCX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.43 vs. FHCCX (-21.46). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 8.10 vs. FHCCX (-18.06).
| FHCCX | JNGLX | FHCCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.80 | 211% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.80 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.462 | 3.152 | -15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.46 | -12.43 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.22 | 21.16 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.06 | 8.10 | -223% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.28 | 38.48 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement