Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs JNGLX
FHCCX vs JNGLX Comparison
Open Charts FHCCX vs JNGLX
FHCCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and JNGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 5.81B vs. FHCCX (3.12B). JNGLX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: JNGLX (0.40) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FHCCX (29 years) vs JNGLX (28 years). FHCCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.81). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. JNGLX (30.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FHCCX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.62 vs. FHCCX (13.75). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 25.90 vs. FHCCX (-18.43).
| FHCCX | JNGLX | FHCCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.81 | 207% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.81 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.540 | 14.138 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.12B | 5.81B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.75 | 34.62 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.34 | 35.76 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.43 | 25.90 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.77 | 89.09 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement