Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs JNGLX
FHCCX vs JNGLX Comparison
Open Charts FHCCX vs JNGLX
FHCCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and JNGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 5.4B vs. FHCCX (2.91B). JNGLX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: JNGLX (0.43) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FHCCX (29 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). FHCCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.81). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. JNGLX (30.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FHCCX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.28 vs. FHCCX (0.19). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 15.28 vs. FHCCX (-30.57).
| FHCCX | JNGLX | FHCCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.81 | 207% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.81 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.434 | 2.457 | -18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 5.4B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.19 | 28.28 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.45 | 20.56 | -80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.57 | 15.28 | -200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.72 | 89.55 | 34% |