Ad is loading...
FHCCX vs SHSAX
FHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and SHSAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.64B vs. FHCCX (3.74B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: SHSAX (0.21) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FHCCX (27 years) vs SHSAX (25 years). FHCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FHCCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.37 vs. FHCCX (-15.53). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -5.99 vs. FHCCX (-13.66).
| FHCCX | SHSAX | FHCCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.09 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.09 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.874 | -3.011 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.74B | 6.64B | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.53 | -9.37 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.67 | -14.24 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.66 | -5.99 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.41 | 11.59 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...