Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs SHSAX
FHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: SHSAX (0.23) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FHCCX (28 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). FHCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). SHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FHCCX (37.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FHCCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.37 vs. FHCCX (-21.46). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -13.76 vs. FHCCX (-18.06).
| FHCCX | SHSAX | FHCCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.09 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.09 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.462 | -4.596 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 6.07B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.46 | -16.37 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.22 | 2.70 | -119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.06 | -13.76 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.28 | 23.96 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement