Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs SHSAX
FHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.29B vs. FHCCX (3.35B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: SHSAX (0.22) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FHCCX (28 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). FHCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FHCCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.68 vs. FHCCX (-20.18). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -16.14 vs. FHCCX (-21.35).
| FHCCX | SHSAX | FHCCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.09 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.09 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.797 | -6.646 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.35B | 6.29B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.18 | -16.68 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.03 | -7.36 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.35 | -16.14 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.35 | 1.23 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement