Ad is loading...
FHCCX vs SHSAX
FHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Mar 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.41B vs. FHCCX (3.96B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: SHSAX (0.23) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FHCCX (27 years) vs SHSAX (25 years). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. SHSAX (29.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FHCCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.46 vs. FHCCX (-15.09). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.07 vs. FHCCX (-5.55).
| FHCCX | SHSAX | FHCCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.360 | 6.486 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.96B | 7.41B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.09 | -4.46 | 338% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.65 | -2.28 | 380% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.55 | 7.07 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.21 | 28.18 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...