Ad is loading...
FHCCX vs SHSAX
FHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a StrongBuy and SHSAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.52B vs. FHCCX (4.07B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: SHSAX (0.23) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FHCCX (27 years) vs SHSAX (25 years). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. SHSAX (29.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FHCCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.72 vs. FHCCX (-7.41). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.68 vs. FHCCX (-3.60).
| FHCCX | SHSAX | FHCCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.721 | 6.246 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.07B | 7.52B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.41 | -1.72 | 431% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.43 | -2.56 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.60 | 5.68 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.56 | 34.15 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers