Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs SHSAX
FHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.58B vs. FHCCX (3.3B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: SHSAX (0.21) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FHCCX (28 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). FHCCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FHCCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. FHCCX (-6.91). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -7.39 vs. FHCCX (-13.32).
| FHCCX | SHSAX | FHCCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.09 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.09 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.314 | 7.047 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.3B | 6.58B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.91 | -0.09 | 7,351% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.91 | 3.89 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.32 | -7.39 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.61 | 27.96 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement