Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs SHSAX
FHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison
Open Charts FHCCX vs SHSAX
FHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 5.89B vs. FHCCX (2.91B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: SHSAX (0.27) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FHCCX (29 years) vs SHSAX (27 years). FHCCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FHCCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.39 vs. FHCCX (0.19). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -19.33 vs. FHCCX (-30.57).
| FHCCX | SHSAX | FHCCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.09 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.09 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.434 | -2.935 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 5.89B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.27 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.19 | 4.39 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.45 | -4.60 | 358% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.57 | -19.33 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.72 | 40.30 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement