Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs SHSAX
FHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison
Open Charts FHCCX vs SHSAX
FHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.23B vs. FHCCX (3.17B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: SHSAX (0.26) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FHCCX (29 years) vs SHSAX (27 years). FHCCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FHCCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.27 vs. FHCCX (9.57). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -13.99 vs. FHCCX (-22.29).
| FHCCX | SHSAX | FHCCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.09 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.09 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.912 | 5.067 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.17B | 6.23B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 10.27 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.09 | 3.36 | -181% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.29 | -13.99 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.94 | 43.09 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement