Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCIX vs FSPHX
FHCIX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCIX vs. FSPHX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCIX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. FHCIX (3.28B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCIX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FHCIX (0.00). FHCIX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCIX (29 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FHCIX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FHCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FHCIX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX (-10.07) and FHCIX (-10.57) have marching annual gain over last year. FHCIX return over 5 years is better than : -1.19 vs. FSPHX (-10.36).
| FHCIX | FSPHX | FHCIX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.041 | 5.358 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 5.96B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.57 | -10.07 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.06 | 10.19 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.19 | -10.36 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.59 | 39.96 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers