Ad is loading...
FHCIX vs FSPHX
FHCIX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCIX vs. FSPHX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCIX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.2B vs. FHCIX (3.57B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCIX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FHCIX (0.00). FHCIX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCIX (29 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FHCIX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHCIX (37.00). FHCIX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.31 vs. FHCIX (-12.58). FHCIX return over 5 years is better than : -4.03 vs. FSPHX (-11.47).
| FHCIX | FSPHX | FHCIX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.63 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.63 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.048 | -7.229 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 6.2B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.58 | -11.31 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.75 | 5.18 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.03 | -11.47 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.65 | 8.19 | 350% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...