Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCIX vs FSPHX
FHCIX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCIX vs. FSPHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCIX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. FHCIX (3.3B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCIX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FHCIX (0.00). FHCIX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCIX (29 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FHCIX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FHCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FHCIX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. FHCIX (-0.43). FHCIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.52 vs. FSPHX (-8.84).
| FHCIX | FSPHX | FHCIX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.296 | 10.532 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.3B | 6.22B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.43 | 0.02 | -2,566% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.33 | 10.47 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.52 | -8.84 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.58 | 39.34 | 195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement