Ad is loading...
FHCIX vs FSPHX
FHCIX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCIX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCIX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. FHCIX (3.74B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCIX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FHCIX (0.00). FHCIX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCIX (29 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FHCIX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FHCIX (37.00). FHCIX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.31 vs. FHCIX (-9.64). FHCIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.13 vs. FSPHX (-7.06).
| FHCIX | FSPHX | FHCIX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.65 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.65 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.599 | -5.798 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.74B | 6.42B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.64 | -8.31 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.94 | -9.31 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.13 | -7.06 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.60 | 8.14 | 351% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers