Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCIX vs FSPHX
FHCIX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCIX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCIX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. FHCIX (3.23B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCIX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FHCIX (0.00). FHCIX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCIX (29 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FHCIX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHCIX (37.00). FHCIX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.53 vs. FHCIX (-12.26). FHCIX return over 5 years is better than : -10.00 vs. FSPHX (-17.67).
| FHCIX | FSPHX | FHCIX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.63 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.63 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.408 | -5.798 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.23B | 5.74B | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.26 | -11.53 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.02 | -8.57 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.00 | -17.67 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.72 | 8.06 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement