Ad is loading...
FHCIX vs FSPHX
FHCIX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCIX vs. FSPHX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCIX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.74B vs. FHCIX (3.96B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCIX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FHCIX (0.00). FHCIX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCIX (29 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FHCIX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FHCIX (37.00). FHCIX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX (-9.89) and FHCIX (-10.31) have marching annual gain over last year. FHCIX return over 5 years is better than : 16.13 vs. FSPHX (7.38).
| FHCIX | FSPHX | FHCIX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.65 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.65 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.939 | 0.844 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.96B | 6.74B | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.31 | -9.89 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.16 | 0.86 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.13 | 7.38 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.13 | 14.97 | 261% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...