Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCIX vs FSPHX
FHCIX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FHCIX vs FSPHX
FHCIX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCIX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCIX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. FHCIX (2.91B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCIX: FSPHX (0.45) vs FHCIX (0.00). FHCIX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCIX (30 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FHCIX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FHCIX (52.00). FHCIX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.98 vs. FSPHX (0.76). FHCIX return over 5 years is better than : -14.57 vs. FSPHX (-23.99).
| FHCIX | FSPHX | FHCIX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.62 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.62 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.015 | -11.527 | -0% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 5.78B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.98 | 0.76 | 1,182% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.81 | -10.88 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.57 | -23.99 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.24 | 37.35 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement