Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCIX vs FSPHX
FHCIX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FHCIX vs FSPHX
FHCIX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCIX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCIX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. FHCIX (3.12B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCIX: FSPHX (0.42) vs FHCIX (0.00). FHCIX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCIX (30 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FHCIX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FHCIX (52.00). FHCIX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.75 vs. FSPHX (14.59). FHCIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.40 vs. FSPHX (-10.56).
| FHCIX | FSPHX | FHCIX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.62 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.62 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.300 | 5.675 | 340% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.12B | 6.3B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.42 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.75 | 14.59 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.46 | 10.34 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.40 | -10.56 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.02 | 46.08 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement