Ad is loading...
FHCIX vs PRHSX
FHCIX vs PRHSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCIX vs. PRHSX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCIX is a Hold and PRHSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRHSX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FHCIX (3.57B). PRHSX pays higher dividends than FHCIX: PRHSX (0.01) vs FHCIX (0.00). FHCIX was incepted earlier than PRHSX: FHCIX (29 years) vs PRHSX (29 years). PRHSX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FHCIX (0.69). PRHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.40 vs. FHCIX (37.00). FHCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRHSX: FHCIX (0) vs PRHSX (2500). FHCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.74 vs. PRHSX (-20.16). FHCIX return over 5 years is better than : -4.59 vs. PRHSX (-10.03).
| FHCIX | PRHSX | FHCIX / PRHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.80 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.80 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.605 | -6.991 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 11.2B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.74 | -20.16 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.01 | -10.10 | -50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.59 | -10.03 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.31 | -5.35 | -530% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers