Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHERX vs RSLBX
FHERX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FHERX vs RSLBX
FHERX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. FHERX (18.4M). FHERX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FHERX (0.92) vs RSLBX (0.14). FHERX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FHERX (5 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). RSLBX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FHERX (1.19). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FHERX (24.00). FHERX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLBX: FHERX (0) vs RSLBX (250). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. FHERX (10.04). FHERX return over 5 years is better than : 17.08 vs. RSLBX (-9.50).
| FHERX | RSLBX | FHERX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.74 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.74 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.446 | 11.594 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.4M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.14 | 664% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.04 | 12.12 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.67 | 26.28 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.08 | -9.50 | -180% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement