RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. FHERX (17.8M). FHERX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FHERX (0.91) vs RSLBX (0.14). FHERX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FHERX (5 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). RSLBX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FHERX (1.19). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FHERX (24.00). FHERX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLBX: FHERX (0) vs RSLBX (250). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. FHERX (4.34). FHERX return over 5 years is better than : 12.28 vs. RSLBX (-14.44).

	FHERX	RSLBX	FHERX / RSLBX
Total Expense Ratio	0.89	1.74	51%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	1.19	1.74	68%
Fund Existence	5 years	24 years	-
Gain YTD	10.080	11.724	86%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	17.8M	91.4B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.91	0.14	634%
Returns for 1 year	4.34	7.38	59%
Returns for 3 years	22.17	33.52	66%
Returns for 5 years	12.28	-14.44	-85%
Returns for 10 years	N/A	63.81	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
AULGX	105.90	0.89	+0.85%
American Century Ultra® R5
HUSEX	33.12	N/A	N/A
Huber Small Cap Value Instl
OARDX	28.46	N/A	N/A
Invesco Rising Dividends A
GSEPX	73.71	N/A	N/A
Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights P
SVXYX	101.84	N/A	N/A
Smead International Value Y