FHI
Price
$47.55
Change
-$0.49 (-1.02%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
Capitalization
3.69B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IVZ
Price
$22.70
Change
-$0.22 (-0.96%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
Capitalization
10.1B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHI vs IVZ

Header iconFHI vs IVZ Comparison
Open Charts FHI vs IVZBanner chart's image
Federated Hermes
Price$47.55
Change-$0.49 (-1.02%)
Volume$568.05K
Capitalization3.69B
Inves
Price$22.70
Change-$0.22 (-0.96%)
Volume$4.3M
Capitalization10.1B
FHI vs IVZ Comparison Chart in %
FHI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IVZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHI vs. IVZ commentary
Nov 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHI is a Hold and IVZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 21, 2025
Stock price -- (FHI: $47.55 vs. IVZ: $22.70)
Brand notoriety: FHI and IVZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHI: 96% vs. IVZ: 86%
Market capitalization -- FHI: $3.69B vs. IVZ: $10.1B
FHI [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.69B. IVZ’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $153.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIVZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FHI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IVZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVZ is a better buy in the long-term than FHI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IVZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the short-term than IVZ.

Price Growth

FHI (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.35% price change this week, while IVZ (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHI is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

IVZ is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.45% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVZ($10.1B) has a higher market cap than FHI($3.69B). IVZ has higher P/E ratio than FHI: IVZ (15.44) vs FHI (9.95). IVZ YTD gains are higher at: 35.610 vs. FHI (19.129). IVZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.52B vs. FHI (554M). FHI has less debt than IVZ: FHI (461M) vs IVZ (1.88B). IVZ has higher revenues than FHI: IVZ (6.28B) vs FHI (1.74B).
FHIIVZFHI / IVZ
Capitalization3.69B10.1B37%
EBITDA554M1.52B36%
Gain YTD19.12935.61054%
P/E Ratio9.9515.4464%
Revenue1.74B6.28B28%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt461M1.88B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHI vs IVZ: Fundamental Ratings
FHI
IVZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6586
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1548
SMR RATING
1..100
3082
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5612
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7146
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVZ's Valuation (19) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FHI (24) in the null industry. This means that IVZ’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVZ (48) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's SMR Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVZ (82) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHI (56) in the null industry. This means that IVZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHI’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FHI (71) in the null industry. This means that IVZ’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHIIVZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IVZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBE78.320.42
+0.54%
Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF
FFIU22.34N/A
N/A
Fieldstone UVA Uncons Md-Trm Fxd Inc ETF
MMSD25.40N/A
N/A
Nyli Mackay Muni Short Duration ETF
IGRO78.85-0.69
-0.87%
iShares International Dividend Gr ETF
OAKM25.95-0.28
-1.07%
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF

FHI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHI has been closely correlated with AMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHI jumps, then AMG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHI
1D Price
Change %
FHI100%
-1.02%
AMG - FHI
68%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
TROW - FHI
68%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
BLK - FHI
66%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
AMP - FHI
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
IVZ - FHI
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
More