FHI
Price
$44.24
Change
+$0.18 (+0.41%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.04B
27 days until earnings call
STT
Price
$105.95
Change
+$0.58 (+0.55%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.35B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHI vs STT

Header iconFHI vs STT Comparison
Open Charts FHI vs STTBanner chart's image
Federated Hermes
Price$44.24
Change+$0.18 (+0.41%)
Volume$5.05K
Capitalization3.04B
State Street
Price$105.95
Change+$0.58 (+0.55%)
Volume$12.82K
Capitalization23.35B
FHI vs STT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHI vs. STT commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHI is a StrongBuy and STT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FHI: $44.06 vs. STT: $105.37)
Brand notoriety: FHI and STT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHI: 48% vs. STT: 117%
Market capitalization -- FHI: $3.04B vs. STT: $23.35B
FHI [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.04B. STT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $23.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FHI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the long-term than STT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • STT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the short-term than STT.

Price Growth

FHI (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.26% price change this week, while STT (@Investment Managers) price change was +6.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHI is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

STT is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.71% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STT($23.3B) has a higher market cap than FHI($3.04B). STT has higher P/E ratio than FHI: STT (13.84) vs FHI (10.61). STT (9.120) and FHI (8.900) have similar YTD gains . STT has more cash in the bank: 4.05B vs. FHI (561M). FHI has less debt than STT: FHI (458M) vs STT (21.5B). STT has higher revenues than FHI: STT (11.9B) vs FHI (1.61B).
FHISTTFHI / STT
Capitalization3.04B23.3B13%
EBITDA451MN/A-
Gain YTD8.9009.12098%
P/E Ratio10.6113.8477%
Revenue1.61B11.9B14%
Total Cash561M4.05B14%
Total Debt458M21.5B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHI vs STT: Fundamental Ratings
FHI
STT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1625
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1531
SMR RATING
1..100
398
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4614
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2167
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FHI's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as STT (36) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as STT (31) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.

STT's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHI (39) in the null industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.

STT's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHI (46) in the null industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STT (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than STT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHISTT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AI24.721.08
+4.57%
C3ai
ESSA19.420.52
+2.75%
ESSA Bancorp
BMRA3.200.07
+2.24%
Biomerica
CTLP10.99-0.02
-0.18%
Cantaloupe
INSM101.74-3.11
-2.97%
Insmed

FHI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHI has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHI jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHI
1D Price
Change %
FHI100%
+1.31%
APAM - FHI
68%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
VRTS - FHI
67%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
STT - FHI
67%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
SEIC - FHI
66%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
JHG - FHI
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
More