Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHJMX vs TRZPX
FHJMX vs TRZPX Comparison
Open Charts FHJMX vs TRZPX
FHJMX vs TRZPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHJMX has more cash in the bank: 993M vs. TRZPX (886M). TRZPX pays higher dividends than FHJMX: TRZPX (2.68) vs FHJMX (2.14). FHJMX was incepted earlier than TRZPX: FHJMX (12 years) vs TRZPX (5 years). TRZPX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FHJMX (0.77). TRZPX (52.80) and FHJMX (51.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHJMX (0) and TRZPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHJMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.19 vs. TRZPX (0.81). FHJMX return over 5 years is better than : 17.95 vs. TRZPX (10.07).
| FHJMX | TRZPX | FHJMX / TRZPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.84 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.228 | 7.416 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 993M | 886M | 112% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 2.68 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.19 | 0.81 | 2,111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.68 | 22.15 | 274% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.95 | 10.07 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers