Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHJTX vs TRZPX
FHJTX vs TRZPX Comparison
Open Charts FHJTX vs TRZPX
FHJTX vs TRZPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHJTX has more cash in the bank: 988M vs. TRZPX (878M). TRZPX pays higher dividends than FHJTX: TRZPX (2.69) vs FHJTX (1.38). FHJTX was incepted earlier than TRZPX: FHJTX (12 years) vs TRZPX (5 years). FHJTX (1.81) is less costly to investors than TRZPX (0.84). TRZPX (52.80) and FHJTX (51.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHJTX (0) and TRZPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.43 vs. TRZPX (3.61). FHJTX return over 5 years is better than : 12.97 vs. TRZPX (9.38).
| FHJTX | TRZPX | FHJTX / TRZPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.84 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.959 | 6.006 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 988M | 878M | 113% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 2.69 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.43 | 3.61 | 567% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.57 | 22.60 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.97 | 9.38 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement