Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs LNGZX
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$41.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$42.70
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.05M
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. LNGZX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. LNGZX (48.1M). FHKAX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FHKAX (1.22) vs LNGZX (1.13). FHKAX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKAX (17 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKAX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.77 vs. FHKAX (14.16). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.63 vs. LNGZX (-20.03).
| FHKAX | LNGZX | FHKAX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.24 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.39 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.811 | 15.785 | 56% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 48.1M | 2,281% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.13 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.16 | 16.77 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.58 | 2.10 | 1,454% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.63 | -20.03 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.84 | -9.48 | -125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers