Ad is loading...
FHKAX vs LNGZX
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$39.11
Change+$0.62 (+1.61%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$37.00
Change+$0.27 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. LNGZX commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and LNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. LNGZX (44.3M). FHKAX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FHKAX (1.51) vs LNGZX (0.69). FHKAX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKAX (17 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FHKAX (24.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKAX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.60 vs. LNGZX (12.89). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.23 vs. LNGZX (-30.89).
| FHKAX | LNGZX | FHKAX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.259 | 12.687 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 44.3M | 2,512% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.69 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.60 | 12.89 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.15 | -34.16 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.23 | -30.89 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.92 | -2.49 | -1,405% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers