Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs LNGZX
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$46.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$44.93
Change-$0.34 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.68M
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. LNGZX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a StrongBuy and LNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. LNGZX (49.7M). FHKAX (1.07) and LNGZX (1.05) have matching dividends . FHKAX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKAX (17 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKAX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.19 vs. FHKAX (33.57). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.56 vs. LNGZX (-31.82).
| FHKAX | LNGZX | FHKAX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.24 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.39 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.324 | 22.783 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 49.7M | 2,487% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.05 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.57 | 40.19 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.12 | 2.87 | 1,470% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.56 | -31.82 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.42 | 11.17 | 496% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement