Ad is loading...
FHKAX vs LNGZX
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$38.14
Change+$0.28 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$39.74
Change+$0.32 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.85M
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. LNGZX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and LNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. LNGZX (44.9M). FHKAX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FHKAX (1.17) vs LNGZX (1.07). FHKAX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKAX (17 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKAX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.30 vs. FHKAX (14.13). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.38 vs. LNGZX (-25.15).
| FHKAX | LNGZX | FHKAX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.24 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.39 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.303 | 6.916 | -19% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 44.9M | 2,617% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.07 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 19.30 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.90 | -2.58 | -770% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.38 | -25.15 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.74 | -17.46 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...