Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs LNGZX
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.89
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$48.58
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.49M
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. LNGZX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. LNGZX (52.5M). LNGZX (0.87) and FHKAX (0.86) have matching dividends . FHKAX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKAX (17 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKAX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.06 vs. LNGZX (31.00). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.88 vs. LNGZX (-36.25).
| FHKAX | LNGZX | FHKAX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.24 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.39 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.485 | 31.760 | 127% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 52.5M | 3,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.06 | 31.00 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.45 | 41.62 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.88 | -36.25 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.33 | 26.40 | 335% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement