Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs LNGZX
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$52.73
Change-$0.57 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$47.58
Change-$0.34 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.27M
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. LNGZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. LNGZX (51.3M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: LNGZX (0.91) vs FHKAX (0.85). FHKAX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKAX (18 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKAX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.37 vs. LNGZX (30.32). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.94 vs. LNGZX (-38.62).
| FHKAX | LNGZX | FHKAX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.24 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.39 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.947 | 29.048 | 134% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 51.3M | 3,534% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.91 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.37 | 30.32 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.81 | 29.35 | 269% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.94 | -38.62 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.08 | 21.38 | 403% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement