Ad is loading...
FHKAX vs LNGZX
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$38.87
Change-$0.08 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$36.56
Change-$0.29 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.01M
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. LNGZX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. LNGZX (43M). FHKAX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FHKAX (1.51) vs LNGZX (0.69). FHKAX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKAX (17 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FHKAX (24.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKAX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.64 vs. LNGZX (20.64). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.40 vs. LNGZX (-32.30).
| FHKAX | LNGZX | FHKAX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.330 | -0.841 | -158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 43M | 2,572% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.69 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.64 | 20.64 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.94 | -35.22 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.40 | -32.30 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.63 | -10.35 | -267% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers