Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs LNGZX
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs LNGZX
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. LNGZX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. LNGZX (41.5M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: LNGZX (2.07) vs FHKAX (1.20). FHKAX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKAX (18 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). LNGZX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKAX (250) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.41 vs. LNGZX (-13.39). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.18 vs. LNGZX (-35.10).
| FHKAX | LNGZX | FHKAX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.24 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.49 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.942 | -10.271 | -330% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 41.5M | 6,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.07 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.41 | -13.39 | -339% |
| Returns for 3 years | 138.01 | 20.11 | 686% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.18 | -35.10 | -129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.48 | 10.33 | 1,863% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement