Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MCHFX
FHKAX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MCHFX
FHKAX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MCHFX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and MCHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.78B vs. MCHFX (398M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MCHFX (1.33) vs FHKAX (1.16). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: FHKAX (18 years) vs MCHFX (28 years). MCHFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). MCHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.73 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCHFX: FHKAX (250) vs MCHFX (2500). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.29 vs. MCHFX (6.02). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.76 vs. MCHFX (-38.76).
| FHKAX | MCHFX | FHKAX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.25 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.25 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.572 | -4.474 | -549% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 398M | 698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.33 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.29 | 6.02 | 802% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.86 | 33.21 | 340% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.76 | -38.76 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.33 | 7.58 | 2,499% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers