Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MICFX
FHKAX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MICFX
FHKAX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MICFX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. MICFX (382M). MICFX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MICFX (1.50) vs FHKAX (1.25). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKAX (18 years) vs MICFX (16 years). FHKAX (1.17) and MICFX (1.13) have similar cost to investors . MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.73 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKAX (250) vs MICFX (100000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.22 vs. MICFX (1.86). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.28 vs. MICFX (-32.15).
| FHKAX | MICFX | FHKAX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.13 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.13 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.439 | 0.524 | 6,383% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.58B | 382M | 675% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.50 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.22 | 1.86 | 2,755% |
| Returns for 3 years | 129.90 | 35.88 | 362% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.28 | -32.15 | -138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 195.03 | 5.95 | 3,279% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement