Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MMCFX
FHKAX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MMCFX
FHKAX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MMCFX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and MMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. MMCFX (43.3M). FHKAX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: FHKAX (1.18) vs MMCFX (0.31). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: FHKAX (18 years) vs MMCFX (32 years). MMCFX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCFX: FHKAX (250) vs MMCFX (2000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 68.58 vs. MMCFX (13.20). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.70 vs. MMCFX (-35.19).
| FHKAX | MMCFX | FHKAX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.14 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.46 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.737 | 1.103 | 3,058% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 43.3M | 6,282% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 0.31 | 386% |
| Returns for 1 year | 68.58 | 13.20 | 520% |
| Returns for 3 years | 121.83 | 11.56 | 1,054% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.70 | -35.19 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 238.87 | -49.00 | -487% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers