Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs NGCAX
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$41.99
Change+$0.06 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$37.99
Change-$0.12 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.32M
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. NGCAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. NGCAX (47.3M). FHKAX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: FHKAX (1.16) vs NGCAX (1.00). FHKAX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKAX (17 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX (6%) and NGCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKAX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). NGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.84 vs. FHKAX (15.27). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.22 vs. NGCAX (-29.27).
| FHKAX | NGCAX | FHKAX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.49 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.64 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.307 | 14.617 | 64% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 47.3M | 2,429% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.00 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.27 | 18.84 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.12 | -8.02 | -276% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.22 | -29.27 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.75 | -9.80 | -171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement