Ad is loading...
FHKAX vs NGCAX
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$35.27
Change-$0.93 (-2.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$32.78
Change-$0.29 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.12M
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. NGCAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. NGCAX (42.1M). FHKAX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: FHKAX (1.17) vs NGCAX (0.98). FHKAX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKAX (17 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX (6%) and NGCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKAX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). NGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.14 vs. FHKAX (8.06). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.38 vs. NGCAX (-29.09).
| FHKAX | NGCAX | FHKAX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.49 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.64 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.631 | -0.541 | 1,040% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 42.1M | 2,791% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.98 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.06 | 14.14 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.82 | -16.93 | -40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.38 | -29.09 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.61 | -24.83 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers