Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs NGCAX
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs NGCAX
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. NGCAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. NGCAX (44.8M). NGCAX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: NGCAX (1.96) vs FHKAX (1.18). FHKAX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKAX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). NGCAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX (6%) and NGCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKAX (250) vs NGCAX (2000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 82.27 vs. NGCAX (8.36). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.15 vs. NGCAX (-43.14).
| FHKAX | NGCAX | FHKAX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.49 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.74 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.177 | -5.008 | -722% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 44.8M | 6,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.96 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 82.27 | 8.36 | 985% |
| Returns for 3 years | 133.19 | 22.96 | 580% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.15 | -43.14 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 236.17 | 27.98 | 844% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement