Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs NGCAX
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs NGCAX
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. NGCAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a StrongBuy and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.78B vs. NGCAX (41.4M). NGCAX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: NGCAX (2.12) vs FHKAX (1.16). FHKAX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKAX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). NGCAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX (6%) and NGCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKAX (250) vs NGCAX (2000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.63 vs. NGCAX (-2.40). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.34 vs. NGCAX (-44.86).
| FHKAX | NGCAX | FHKAX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.49 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.74 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.899 | -11.943 | -275% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 41.4M | 6,710% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 2.12 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.63 | -2.40 | -2,695% |
| Returns for 3 years | 119.53 | 9.85 | 1,213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.34 | -44.86 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 210.33 | 14.40 | 1,461% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers