Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs RBCRX
FHKAX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs RBCRX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$48.01
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
RBC China Equity R6
Price$11.36
Change+$0.09 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.96M
FHKAX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. RBCRX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and RBCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. RBCRX (5.96M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: RBCRX (1.68) vs FHKAX (1.02). FHKAX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FHKAX (17 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FHKAX (0) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.38 vs. FHKAX (35.51).
| FHKAX | RBCRX | FHKAX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.00 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 6.74 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.974 | 32.588 | 77% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 5.96M | 21,914% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.68 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.51 | 45.38 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.84 | 22.24 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.29 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.94 | 16.84 | 522% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement