Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs RBCRX
FHKAX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs RBCRX
FHKAX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. RBCRX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. RBCRX (6.75M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: RBCRX (3.50) vs FHKAX (1.18). FHKAX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FHKAX (18 years) vs RBCRX (4 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FHKAX (250) vs RBCRX (250000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 72.70 vs. RBCRX (30.79).
| FHKAX | RBCRX | FHKAX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.00 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 6.74 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.817 | 0.243 | 14,344% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 6.75M | 40,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 3.50 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.70 | 30.79 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 119.21 | 48.95 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.95 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.61 | 36.15 | 668% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement