Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs RCEAX
FHKAX vs RCEAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs RCEAX
FHKAX vs RCEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.78B vs. RCEAX (6.73M). RCEAX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: RCEAX (3.33) vs FHKAX (1.16). FHKAX was incepted earlier than RCEAX: FHKAX (18 years) vs RCEAX (4 years). RCEAX (7.70) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). RCEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 134.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX (6%) and RCEAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCEAX: FHKAX (250) vs RCEAX (1000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.63 vs. RCEAX (26.22).
| FHKAX | RCEAX | FHKAX / RCEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.30 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 7.70 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.899 | -1.133 | -2,904% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 6.73M | 41,259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 3.33 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.63 | 26.22 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 119.53 | 47.95 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.34 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 210.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement