Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs WRCGX
FHKAX vs WRCGX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs WRCGX
FHKAX vs WRCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. WRCGX (2.09M). FHKAX pays higher dividends than WRCGX: FHKAX (1.20) vs WRCGX (0.86). FHKAX was incepted earlier than WRCGX: FHKAX (18 years) vs WRCGX (5 years). WRCGX (8.54) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). WRCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WRCGX: FHKAX (250) vs WRCGX (1000000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.11 vs. WRCGX (0.74). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.08 vs. WRCGX (-30.93).
| FHKAX | WRCGX | FHKAX / WRCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.94 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 8.54 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.483 | 0.769 | 4,093% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 2.09M | 127,730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.86 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.11 | 0.74 | 6,533% |
| Returns for 3 years | 126.53 | 24.43 | 518% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.08 | -30.93 | -136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement