Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs GSACX
FHKCX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs GSACX
Fidelity China Region
Price$53.55
Change+$0.55 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.06
Change+$0.33 (+1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63M
FHKCX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. GSACX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and GSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. GSACX (40.6M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than GSACX: FHKCX (0.96) vs GSACX (0.25). FHKCX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FHKCX (30 years) vs GSACX (28 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FHKCX (0) vs GSACX (1000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.07 vs. GSACX (30.40). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.80 vs. GSACX (-37.34).
| FHKCX | GSACX | FHKCX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.21 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 3.05 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.282 | 27.748 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 40.6M | 4,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.25 | 384% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.07 | 30.40 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.29 | 31.00 | 262% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.80 | -37.34 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.34 | 16.03 | 576% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement