Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs GSACX
FHKCX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs GSACX
FHKCX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. GSACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a StrongBuy and GSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 2.78B vs. GSACX (34.7M). FHKCX (1.27) and GSACX (1.27) have matching dividends . FHKCX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FHKCX (31 years) vs GSACX (29 years). GSACX (3.10) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FHKCX (34.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FHKCX (0) vs GSACX (1000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 65.08 vs. GSACX (14.40). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.46 vs. GSACX (-36.21).
| FHKCX | GSACX | FHKCX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.21 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 3.10 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.095 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 34.7M | 8,006% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.27 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 65.08 | 14.40 | 452% |
| Returns for 3 years | 121.35 | 29.12 | 417% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.46 | -36.21 | -101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 216.20 | 19.81 | 1,091% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers