Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs MCSMX
FHKCX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs MCSMX
FHKCX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. MCSMX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. MCSMX (97.6M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: MCSMX (1.57) vs FHKCX (1.30). FHKCX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKCX (31 years) vs MCSMX (15 years). MCSMX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.83 vs. FHKCX (34.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKCX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 82.77 vs. MCSMX (71.62). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.24 vs. MCSMX (-17.38).
| FHKCX | MCSMX | FHKCX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.40 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.57 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.344 | 39.948 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 97.6M | 2,787% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.57 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 82.77 | 71.62 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 135.08 | 74.65 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.24 | -17.38 | -209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 242.65 | 113.85 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers