Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs RBCIX
FHKCX vs RBCIX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs RBCIX
Fidelity China Region
Price$55.19
Change+$1.05 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
RBC China Equity I
Price$12.64
Change+$0.16 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.51M
FHKCX vs RBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. RBCIX (6.51M). RBCIX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: RBCIX (1.32) vs FHKCX (0.98). FHKCX was incepted earlier than RBCIX: FHKCX (30 years) vs RBCIX (4 years). RBCIX (6.23) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). RBCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCIX: FHKCX (0) vs RBCIX (100000). RBCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.80 vs. FHKCX (34.04).
| FHKCX | RBCIX | FHKCX / RBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.05 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 6.23 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.213 | 46.824 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 6.51M | 24,550% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.32 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.04 | 38.80 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 105.60 | 62.72 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.43 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement