Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs RBCIX
FHKCX vs RBCIX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs RBCIX
FHKCX vs RBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. RBCIX (6.48M). RBCIX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: RBCIX (3.60) vs FHKCX (1.32). FHKCX was incepted earlier than RBCIX: FHKCX (31 years) vs RBCIX (4 years). RBCIX (5.44) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). RBCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 134.00 vs. FHKCX (34.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCIX: FHKCX (0) vs RBCIX (100000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.12 vs. RBCIX (0.12).
| FHKCX | RBCIX | FHKCX / RBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.05 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 5.44 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.727 | -5.016 | -613% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 6.48M | 41,183% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 3.60 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.12 | 0.12 | 33,287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 131.17 | 51.66 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.63 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 195.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement