Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKFX vs RNWHX
FHKFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FHKFX vs RNWHX
FHKFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKFX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FHKFX (8.26B). FHKFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FHKFX (1.83) vs RNWHX (1.14). FHKFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FHKFX (8 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). RNWHX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FHKFX (0.02). FHKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FHKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FHKFX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FHKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.40 vs. RNWHX (19.47). FHKFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.56 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| FHKFX | RNWHX | FHKFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.72 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.02 | 0.72 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.002 | 12.651 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.26B | 90.7B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.14 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.40 | 19.47 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.75 | 43.67 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.56 | 14.04 | 303% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement