Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs HLMCX
FHKIX vs HLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs HLMCX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$47.34
Change+$0.70 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$6.08
Change+$0.05 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.16M
FHKIX vs HLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. HLMCX (3.16M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: FHKIX (1.21) vs HLMCX (1.02). FHKIX was incepted earlier than HLMCX: FHKIX (17 years) vs HLMCX (5 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). HLMCX (31.00) and FHKIX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: FHKIX (0) vs HLMCX (100000). FHKIX (31.20) and HLMCX (30.88) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FHKIX | HLMCX | FHKIX / HLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.16 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 4.12 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.892 | 13.774 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 3.16M | 41,337% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.02 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.20 | 30.88 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.43 | -10.56 | -411% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.38 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement