Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MCSMX
FHKIX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCSMX
FHKIX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MCSMX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. MCSMX (97.6M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MCSMX (1.57) vs FHKIX (1.37). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKIX (18 years) vs MCSMX (15 years). MCSMX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.89). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.83 vs. FHKIX (34.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKIX (250) vs MCSMX (2500). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 82.77 vs. MCSMX (71.62). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 36.20 vs. MCSMX (-17.38).
| FHKIX | MCSMX | FHKIX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.40 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.57 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.345 | 39.948 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 97.6M | 2,787% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.57 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 82.77 | 71.62 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 135.22 | 74.65 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.20 | -17.38 | -208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 242.16 | 113.85 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement