Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MMCFX
FHKIX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MMCFX
FHKIX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MMCFX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. MMCFX (40.7M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: FHKIX (1.39) vs MMCFX (0.32). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: FHKIX (18 years) vs MMCFX (32 years). MMCFX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.89). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. FHKIX (34.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCFX: FHKIX (250) vs MMCFX (2000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.52 vs. MMCFX (-7.79). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 48.15 vs. MMCFX (-24.63).
| FHKIX | MMCFX | FHKIX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.14 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.46 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.032 | -1.684 | -1,724% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 40.7M | 6,553% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.32 | 437% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.52 | -7.79 | -443% |
| Returns for 3 years | 128.14 | 14.19 | 903% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.15 | -24.63 | -195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.37 | -54.73 | -342% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers