Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MMCFX
FHKIX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MMCFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$52.77
Change+$0.64 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
AMG Veritas China N
Price$18.42
Change+$0.11 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.09M
FHKIX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MMCFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and MMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MMCFX (49.1M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: FHKIX (1.15) vs MMCFX (1.06). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MMCFX (31 years). MMCFX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCFX: FHKIX (0) vs MMCFX (2000). MMCFX (48.30) and FHKIX (47.46) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 10.15 vs. MMCFX (-50.09).
| FHKIX | MMCFX | FHKIX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.14 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.48 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.122 | 35.529 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 49.1M | 2,821% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.06 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.46 | 48.30 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.72 | 9.68 | 772% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.15 | -50.09 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.28 | -56.85 | -173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement