Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MMCFX
FHKIX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MMCFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$54.32
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
AMG Veritas China N
Price$18.03
Change-$0.11 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.83M
FHKIX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MMCFX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MMCFX (47.8M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: FHKIX (1.02) vs MMCFX (0.95). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MMCFX (31 years). MMCFX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCFX: FHKIX (0) vs MMCFX (2000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.42 vs. MMCFX (27.49). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 10.57 vs. MMCFX (-53.70).
| FHKIX | MMCFX | FHKIX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.14 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.48 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.798 | 33.457 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 47.8M | 3,341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.95 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.42 | 27.49 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.20 | 14.37 | 718% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.57 | -53.70 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.24 | -55.55 | -164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement